Criminal misconduct by US border officers has reached a 5-year high


Criminal misconduct by US border officers has reached a 5-year high

Criminal misconduct by US border officers has reached a five-year high, according to an internal US government report obtained exclusively by Quartz. The offenses range from fraud to capital murder.

The 68-page document covers disciplinary actions within US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the US Border Patrol for the federal government’s 2018 fiscal year, which ended Oct. 1. The unredacted data provides the most comprehensive look yet at the agency’s disciplinary apparatus.

The number of arrests of CBP officers and Border Patrol agents, according to the report, had been on a half-decade decline before leaping 11% between fiscal years 2017 and 2018. (Arrests of officers and agents increased annually starting in 2007 and hit a high of 348 in 2012.)

“[A]n unacceptable number of CBP employees are arrested each year for violating federal, state, or local law,” the report says. Of 268 CBP employees arrested in fiscal 2018, 11 were arrested twice; one was arrested four times; and one was arrested five times, resulting in a total of 286 arrests.

Allegation Number of arrests
Drug/Alcohol-Related Misconduct 129
Domestic/Family Misconduct 57
Assault 9
Corruption 7
Impeding the Criminal Justice System 17
Property Crimes 6
Traffic/Driving Misconduct 8
Minor Offenses 1
Crimes Involving Children 15
Threatening Behavior 3
Weapons Violations 8
White Collar Crime 4
Miscellaneous Misconduct 12
Sexual Misconduct 7
Mission-Related Misconduct 1
Violent Crimes 2

That’s an arrest rate of about 0.5% of the overall force, which numbers more than 60,000. While the percentage seems small, it is about five times that of other US law enforcement agencies. Arrests of state and local police, for example, occur at an average rate of about 0.1% of the force per year, according to the Henry A. Wallace Police Crime Database.

Corruption, specifically, has been an enduring problem for CBP. A 2015 audit by CBP’s integrity advisory panel found that “arrests for corruption of CBP personnel far exceed, on a per capita basis, such arrests at other federal law enforcement agencies.” Although it does not break down individual cases by year, 144 CBP employees were arrested or indicted on corruption charges between fiscal year 2005 and fiscal year 2012. “The true levels of corruption within CBP are not known, nor is there an evaluation based on sophisticated risk analysis,” it says.

The fiscal 2018 discipline report lists seven corruption-related arrests for the year, four for unspecified white collar crimes, one for mission-related misconduct, and 12 for “miscellaneous misconduct.” It does not provide details or a comparison to corruption-related arrests in past years. Border corruption is enough of a problem that the FBI has a task force dedicated entirely to rooting out rogue border officers and agents.

James Tomsheck, CBP’s chief of internal affairs from 2006-2014, told Quartz that the number of arrests detailed in the report are “high for any organization.” And, as Christopher Herrmann, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and a former New York Police Department crime analyst, explained in an earlier interview with Quartz, they may in fact be artificially low due to “professional courtesy.”

“Obviously if it’s a major crime, those aren’t things you can sweep under the rug,” Herrmann said. “But even lower felony stuff might get overlooked. There’s so much passing over of bad things when cops do it.”

Faster isn’t better

This uptick in misconduct may be in part the result of a hiring surge ordered by US president Donald Trump last year as he ramped up efforts to crack down on illegal immigration at the southern border. Issuing an executive order, Trump demanded the Border Patrol add 5,000 new agents “as soon as is practicable” to help fulfill his agenda.

Past hiring sprees ordered by political decree have also led to more problems with conduct at the immigration enforcement agency. In 2006, US president George W. Bush ordered the hiring of an additional 8,000 Border Patrol agents. To achieve that, training for new agents was reduced, and background checks on candidates were truncated or not performed at all.

There is “a clear relationship” between wrongdoing and those hired during surges, Tomsheck said. A 2012 audit by the Government Accountability Office found that a hiring rush then attracted an unknown number of recruits who joined “solely to engage in mission-compromising activity.” According to Tomsheck, more than 30 people during this period, in fact, confessed to having applied for the job at the direction of drug traffickers.

“Hiring surges afford infiltrators an opportunity that doesn’t otherwise exist,” he said.

A spokesperson for CBP told Quartz that any “decision to change any aspect of the hiring process should not result in the erosion or lowering of agency standards. All successful applicants must still pass a polygraph examination, strenuous vetting checks, and the highest level of background investigation available, in addition to still undergoing basic training at our academies. We are confident that our recruiting and hiring processes are exceptionally strong.”

It all boils down to one thing, argues Tomsheck: Patience.

“There has to be some acceptance and understanding that making suitability determinations for any law enforcement organization has to be a carefully conducted, thorough process,” he said. “Attempting to compress or expedite that process is nearly certain to introduce errors and compromise the integrity of the workforce.”

Rogue’s gallery

According to the report, there were 57 domestic violence-related arrests within the CBP and Border Patrol ranks last year, a 10.5% increase over the year before. Alcohol-related driving offenses accounted for 94 arrests CBP-wide. One Border Patrol agent was arrested for a DUI twice in one week, losing his gun, ammunition, radio, baton, and handcuffs in the process. He received a 45-day suspension. Another was charged with a felony DUI, “after crashing into another vehicle while driving the wrong way on the interstate,” the report says.

Outside of arrests by law enforcement, the new CBP report says that 9% of the CBP workforce was accused by supervisors or members of the public of “some degree of misconduct resulting in formal disciplinary action” last year. Two CBP officers and one Border Patrol agent were also fired after being convicted of felonies. (Removal from federal service is mandatory after a felony conviction.)

Under certain circumstances, some officers and agents are allowed to quit before they can be fired. As Quartz reported in August, Border Patrol agent Jason Andrew McGilvray agreed to resign and forfeit his security clearance after pleading guilty to assaulting a migrant.

CBP will impose indefinite suspensions when there is reasonable belief that an employee committed a crime. In fiscal 2018, 37 CBP employees were indefinitely suspended, a 42% increase from the year before.

Reasons for indefinite suspensions in fiscal 2018:

Employee position Criminal offense
Border Patrol agent Possession of a controlled substance and being under the influence of unknown narcotics
Border Patrol agent Attempted enticement of a minor and possession of child pornography
Border Patrol agent Concealed and/or omitted information during the application process for naturalization
Border Patrol agent Production of child pornography
Border Patrol agent Illegal sales of counterfeit merchandise
Border Patrol agent Criminal mischief
Border Patrol agent Sexual assault
Border Patrol agent Aggravated assault and endangering a child
Border Patrol agent Knowingly distributing child pornography
Border Patrol agent Deprivation of rights under color of law and falsification of records in federal investigations
Border Patrol agent Enticement of a minor, receipt of child pornography, access of child pornography with intent to view
Border Patrol agent Aggravated assault w/deadly weapon and assault family/household member impeding breath/circulation of blood
Border Patrol agent Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon
Border Patrol agent Theft of property and tampering with governmental record to defraud/harm
Border Patrol agent Evading arrest with a motor vehicle
Border Patrol agent Conversion of US property and false entry in accounts and records
Border Patrol agent Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and aiding and abetting, and use/carrying of firearm during a drug crime, and bribery
CBP Agriculture Specialist Fraud in connection with a major disaster or benefits, wire fraud, and engaging in monetary transactions with criminal derived property
CBP officer Vehicular manslaughter
CBP officer Felonious assault
CBP officer False statements to Department of Housing Development to obtain home
CBP officer Sexual battery
CBP officer Possession of child pornography
CBP officer Child pornography
CBP officer Forcibly assaulting, impeding, intimidating and interfering with a federal officer
CBP officer Burglary and robbery
CBP officer Criminal sexual conduct
CBP officer False statements in an application for passport
CBP officer Forcibly assaulting, impeding, intimidating and interfering with a federal officer
CBP officer Forcibly assaulting, impeding, intimidating and interfering with a federal officer
CBP officer Cruelty to animals
Law Enforcement Communications Assistant Obtaining controlled substances by fraud
Supervisory Border Patrol agent Lewd and lascivious acts with a child
Supervisory Border Patrol agent Murder
Supervisory Border Patrol agent Capital murder
Supervisory Border Patrol agent Making a false declaration before a grand jury
Supervisory CBP officer Deprivation of rights under color of law

“The public has placed a great deal of trust in CBP and with that trust comes an expectation that CBP employees will perform their duties with a level of integrity that includes transparency, accountability, and professionalism,” the report concludes, adding, “Those who breach the public trust by engaging in misconduct will continue to be held accountable for their actions.”

Published at Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:23:00 +0000

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *